Blog
The Pedigo Law Corporation | FIGHTING FOR THE AVERAGE JOE®

Attorney Brian Pedigo sucessfully defends another fraud case brought in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding

The United States District Court, Central District of California, in case number 6:08-ap-01384-PC, filed and entered its decision to dismiss a lawsuit against the defendants.  Brian Pedigo, attorney of record for the defendants, filed a motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6) (FRCP 12 is incorporated by reference by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure) on the grounds that judicial estoppel should stop the plaintiff from bringing his claims against defendants.

If you are sued for fraud even though you never lied or did anything wrong, seek a lawyer immediately!
The reason that judicial estoppel applied in this case was because the plaintiff alleged two breaches of contract against defendants whereby the property allegedly at interest in the contract had not been disclosed in Plaintiff’s own prior bankruptcy. Due to Plaintiff’s clearly inconsistent positions, the Court agreed with the Defendant’s argument that judicial estoppel was necessary in order to protect the integrity of the bankruptcy system. The suit was dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice.

Motion to DismissCourt’s Memorandum of Decision

Comments are closed on this post.

E-Mail us

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Subject

Your Message

Code: captcha
Type above code:

Client Testimonial

We were in a tight situation with a former business partner. We needed sound advice fast. Fortunately we found Brian Pedigo. Brian’s expertise in law as well as his straightforward language and uncanny ability to draft professional correspondence really saved us. He was available and responded quickly to all of our needs. Brian listened to our concerns and interpreted our needs into what we should do legally. He continues to impress us and is undoubtedly who we will turn to again and again for legal advice and representation. — E.A. & K.A.

Disclaimer

These testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.